🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A New Soccer Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for using too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.